Home Coinbase Why this VC fintech firm didn't invest in Coinbase and Ripple

Why this VC fintech firm didn't invest in Coinbase and Ripple

5 min read

Nyca Partners, the third most active venture capital firm in fintech globally, is invested in enterprise blockchain efforts, such as the digital remittance service Abra.

But in 2014, Nyca passed on some now valuable blockchain firms, including Coinbase, Ripple and Blockchain.io.

There’s no wistfulness about not buying into those opportunities, said Hans Morris, the former president of Visa and a longtime Citigroup banker who heads Nyca.

“One of the components of our thesis in 2014 was that we didn’t want to invest in anything that’s dependent on the price of cryptocurrencies,” Morris said. “Fundamentally we viewed that as a speculative or ideological investment, not a rational investment.”

Hans Morris, head of Nyca Partners, still believes that investor interest in bitcoin and blockchain is driven by speculation as opposed to use case.

At a recent fintech conference in New York, Morris said he still believes investor interest in bitcoin and blockchain is driven by speculation.

“However, we also felt that this is quite a powerful technology idea — in the same way that the cloud is a powerful technology idea, or that agile sprints have transformed development processes,” Morris said.

Blockchain could possibly translate well for use in an industry where many transactions already run on ledgers. But for financial services, Morris said, implementing blockchain would require ripping out old technology and getting institutions to agree to a synchronized database.

“That’s an idea that people have been talking about for decades, that if there was a single golden source of truth, you can eliminate reconciliations,” Morris said. “That would have profound impact. It’s just that it’s really difficult and expensive to get that status.”


Blockchain’s next big targets in financial services

Banks are at the forefront of blockchain innovation, disrupting cross-border payments, trade finance and product development worldwide.

While synchronization is a useful tool for financial institutions, the technology will need to keep pace with the transaction loads that banks process, he added.

“If you think about any activity in financial services where synchronization of data is of fundamental advantage, where low latency is less essential, and where you can start with a small number of participants who benefit from the application, but can scale to include all participants, then distributed ledgers are potentially an ideal solution,” Morris said.

Moody’s Analytics predicts that blockchain could streamline the process of securities trading and eliminate redundancies in costs as well as increase speed.

“We see post-trade processes as most clearly benefiting from the potential for reduced manual reconciliation across intermediaries’ and counterparties’ ledgers,” Ana Arsov, managing director at Moody’s, said in an email. “Blockchain can also promote transaction transparency, enhance data security and reduce the risk of a single point of failure.”

More from this Author

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Forget Bitcoin: 3 Investments That Are Less Risky and More Reliable – Motley Fool

Bitcoin is not a brand new idea, but it surely’s gaining a renewed curiosity from bu…